It is argued that rich countries should allow people who suffer from war to visit them and should be provided with essential care,
such
as meals and houses. I completely agree with Linking Words
this
statement because these rich Linking Words
nations
have moral responsibilities Use synonyms
such
as protecting people's rightsLinking Words
,
and for economic benefits through new skills and labour.
Remove the comma
apply
Refugees
can have a positive impact on a strong country's economy by allowing new job opportunities in the market. Because some jobs are not preferred by citizens Use synonyms
such
as waiting in coffee shops and cleaning in restaurants, Linking Words
refugees
are in need of money, Use synonyms
therefore
they take these low-level works. Linking Words
Also
, they bring new skills to the country Linking Words
such
as cooking and electrical work. Linking Words
For example
, Linking Words
according to
New York Times Magazine, the USA has taken advantage of around 10000 Linking Words
refugees
by making them work as an electrician.
Another reason why wealthy Use synonyms
nations
should accept Use synonyms
refugees
is the moral responsibility to fulfil international commitments. Wealthy Use synonyms
nations
have obligations to assist individuals living under illegal regimes and residents of poorer states. Use synonyms
Moreover
, honouring these commitments reflects a nation's dedication to global justice and the rule of law. Linking Words
For example
, Saudi Arabia has hosted more than one million Syrians since 2011 which was the beginning of the Syrians' revelation.
In conclusion, countries that have enough money must not ban Linking Words
refugees
from visiting them and I believe that welcoming these people is an ethical obligation and affects economic growth in a good way. I recommend that all Use synonyms
nations
accept all Use synonyms
refugees
from the world and provide them with jobs and protection.Use synonyms
layan992015