An increasing number of people are preferring to eat fast food regularly, it causes a lot of heath issues. Some people think the only solution is to ban it completely. Do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
These days, the number of people who like to eat ready-made
food
Use synonyms
is climbing;
however
Linking Words
, the figure of health problems that are a result of these eating habits is rising. A group of people think that the best way that solve
this
Linking Words
matter is that forbidden to eat . I do not subscribe to
this
Linking Words
perspective owing to the fact that the public loses their jobs and removing items encourages people to use them more. On the one hand, a majority of the population works in fast
food
Use synonyms
restaurants or factories like McDonald's;
consequently
Linking Words
, when the governments ban eating fast
food
Use synonyms
,
then
Linking Words
a lot of employment opportunities are reduced. In fact, convenience
food
Use synonyms
is the big industries that create a lot of job opportunities for communities.
For example
Linking Words
, KFC, the main international brand of fast
food
Use synonyms
, have a number of worker in their stores across the world.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, the fact
that is
Linking Words
really important is that when limited communities from doing work,
such
Linking Words
as eating fast
food
Use synonyms
, they are encouraged to do it more.
In other words
Linking Words
, authorities have to follow new policies that promote healthier meal options. To illustrate, if the price of fresh vegetables, fruits, and so on reduces, the population prefer using these items in their diet
instead
Linking Words
of eating fast
food
Use synonyms
.
To sum up
Linking Words
, in my opinion, governments around the world must not remove fast
food
Use synonyms
industries inasmuch as these sectors have a lot of employees.
In addition
Linking Words
, outright bans persuade the community to eat more;
however
Linking Words
, when they change their politics by lowering the price of healthy ingredients, they prefer to eat them more.
Submitted by maryamkazemi968 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
To improve coherence, ensure that each paragraph clearly transitions from one idea to the next. Using transitional phrases at the beginning of paragraphs can help guide the reader through your argument.
task achievement
While your essay addresses the prompt, consider elaborating more on alternative solutions. This would enhance your task achievement score by providing a more complete response.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are clearly defined and summarize the main points effectively.
task achievement
Your essay provides relevant and specific examples, like KFC and McDonald's, which reinforce your argument.
coherence cohesion
You maintained a clear structure with distinct body paragraphs. Each contains a main point supported by examples or explanations.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • obesity
  • diabetes
  • heart disease
  • nutritional value
  • affordability
  • convenience
  • appealing choice
  • unemployment
  • industry revenues
  • consumer choices
  • regulating
  • nutritional content
  • balanced approach
  • healthy food options
  • incentivize
  • dependency
  • community initiatives
  • urban farming
  • cooking classes
  • outright ban
What to do next:
Look at other essays: