There is no denying the fact that the development of industries destroys our planet.
While
it is a commonly held belief that Linking Words
government
must impose a green tax, there is Correct article usage
the government
also
an argument that there are a lot of ways to reduce Linking Words
pollution
rather than tax. Use synonyms
This
essay will analyse Linking Words
this
topic from both points of view and express my opinion that being strict with Linking Words
factories
is not enough to solve Use synonyms
this
problem. Rather, we should raise the awareness of individuals and create a society Linking Words
that is
aware of the consequences of its actions on the environment.
On one hand, Linking Words
factories
produce emissions and exhaust fumes.Use synonyms
In other words
, the amount of waste the Linking Words
factories
produce has increased.Use synonyms
In addition
, if something breaks, they throw it away and make a new one. Which ends up in landfill sites.Linking Words
For example
, China laws limit emissions and waste from Linking Words
factories
; if they exceed it, the Use synonyms
factories
will pay a tax, which decreases the Use synonyms
pollution
by around 30%.
Use synonyms
On the other hand
, human activity is a major factor in the Linking Words
pollution
.It is Use synonyms
also
possible to say that individuals should try to be greener.They should recycle as much as possible, choose products with less packaging, and take public transportation rather than driving.Linking Words
For instance
, Kuwait University published research that increasing awareness of Linking Words
pollution
will solve it by more than 75%.
In conclusion, there are no easy answers to Use synonyms
this
question.On balance, Linking Words
however
, I tend to believe that getting money from Linking Words
factories
will not repair the destruction, government campaigns should promote recycling, and we should invest in renewable energy from solar, wind, or water power.Use synonyms
gral33jmi