In our competitive community, some people criticize unemployed individuals for getting paid by the government despite their circumstances,
while
others agree that a group of the community should receive some amount of money. I believe that the population should have the right to get benefits from authorities.
On the one hand, it is argued that unemployees are allowed to be provided for by the country's budget, but there are groups of society who disagree with Linking Words
this
statement. There are various situations why those inhabitants do not have work, Linking Words
due to
their health condition, family misfortune and missing the chance to study at educational places. Linking Words
Similarly
, that crowd can be isolated from society and have the only solution to obtain money from the state budget. Linking Words
For example
, Linking Words
according to
statistics from Kazakhstan, human beings who don't work for respectful reasons can get paid 120,000 tenges every month, Linking Words
after
Linking Words
this
funding, the Linking Words
overall
rate of humans could begin a stable life.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the average number of citizens totally disagree with Linking Words
this
law, opponents of unemployment benefits argue that these payments can create a disincentive to work, as receiving financial support without working might decrease the urgency with which individuals seek new unemployment opportunities. Linking Words
Likewise
, it can lead to higher taxes or a reduced economic budget for a certain country. I think that there should be only a special group with legally certified documents to receive that sum of money.
In conclusion, some human beings can not accept rules Linking Words
according
Linking Words
to
those who are economically inactive obtain funds Change preposition
apply
whereas
others advocate for the opposite side that they have the right to get that support. Personally, I can say that there must be only a balance between groups and crucial reasons for it.Linking Words
jj