Some people think it is important to construct new buildings rather than wasting money on maintaining old ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some people believe that investing in new

buildings

Use synonyms

is more beneficial than spending money on maintaining old

buildings

Use synonyms

. I disagree with

this

Linking Words

stance because saving historical architecture has cultural value and renovating existing

structures

Use synonyms

can often be more economical than building new ones.

Firstly

Linking Words

, old

buildings

Use synonyms

often have historical and cultural significance that cannot be replaced by modern

structures

Use synonyms

. They serve as a physical reminder of a city’s past, reflecting the architectural styles, traditions, and events of earlier times.

For example

Linking Words

, cities like Rome or Kyoto attract millions of tourists each year because of their preserved ancient

buildings

Use synonyms

and temples. Destroying

such

Linking Words

structures

Use synonyms

means erasing important parts of human history.

Secondly

Linking Words

, renovating existing

buildings

Use synonyms

is often more economical than constructing entirely new ones. Reusing old materials and

structures

Use synonyms

reduces waste and lowers the demand for new resources which helps to minimize the impact on the environment.

For instance

Linking Words

, many European cities follow a policy of restoration rather than demolition because renovation of old homes tends to cost less and produces fewer carbon emissions than building modern replacements. In conclusion, I strongly believe that maintaining old

buildings

Use synonyms

is a better approach than replacing them with new constructions. Preserving historical monuments enriches our cultural identity and can

also

Linking Words

be a practical and eco-friendly solution in terms of cost and environmental friendliness