In the modern era, many believe that schoolchildren should focus on local
rather than
, as it nurtures a deep sense of identity and cultural pride. I agree with
perspective, arguing that understanding one’s own heritage lays a critical foundation for personal development, a principle well-illustrated by the educational approach in Vietnam.
First of all, local
enables children to connect with their community’s past, fostering
senseAdd an article
show examples
of patriotism and responsibility that
may not replicate as effectively. In Vietnam, the
system dedicates significant time to national and regional narratives,
as the Trung Sisters’ rebellion against Chinese domination in 40 AD and the triumphant Dien Bien Phu victory in 1954, which ended French colonial rule. These lessons highlight resilience, unity, and independence values that resonate with students’ daily lives.
, learning about local heroes inspires young learners to value their heritage and contribute to society. As a student in local
, they had chances to visit relics like war zones or temples that
improvesCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
knowledgeCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
and perception
forChange preposition
show examples
traditional
culturalReplace the word
show examples
.
offers valuable insights into global events,
as the Industrial Revolution’s technological advances or the geopolitical shifts of
War II. It may overwhelm young minds with its complexity and distance.
, understanding how these events influenced Vietnam could enrich perspectives later, but its relevance pales compared to the immediacy of local stories.
, prioritizing local
in early
allows children to develop a solid identity before exploring broader narratives.
In conclusion, I support the prioritization of local
in schools, as seen in Vietnam’s focus on its milestones, which cultivates cultural identity and values.
is beneficial for global awareness, integrating it later ensures a balanced
that starts with the local context.