Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is thought that the information regarding politicians’ personal
lives
Use synonyms
should not be shared in print media.
This
Linking Words
essay strongly agrees with
this
Linking Words
suggestion and will explain the reasons.
Firstly
Linking Words
, what makes the details related to private aspects of politicians’
lives
Use synonyms
should not be shared in newspapers is that it could be harmful not only to these individuals but
also
Linking Words
to their families.
This
Linking Words
is because revealing some details from their personal
lives
Use synonyms
could expose them to unwanted comments or allegations, which might lead to a great deal of distress. In Poland,
for instance
Linking Words
, in 2015, the vice-prime minister committed suicide
due to
Linking Words
not handling the pressure caused by the paparazzi invading his and his family’s private life.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, obtaining
this
Linking Words
type of information, in most cases, means breaking the law.
This
Linking Words
is because the right to privacy is one of the most fundamental policies in society, and anyone who wants to access the
lives
Use synonyms
of politicians must obtain their consent.
However
Linking Words
, not only are paparazzi hired to invade properties belonging to politicians to take photos without their permission, but
also
Linking Words
politicians’ colleagues and relatives are bribed to share confidential facts from their
lives
Use synonyms
.
For instance
Linking Words
, an accident in which Princess Diana was killed was partly caused by the paparazzi who followed her car, trying to take photos of her and her boyfriend against their will. In conclusion, I strongly support the suggestion that politicians’
lives
Use synonyms
should not be subject to the interest of newspapers because revealing personal facts from politicians’
lives
Use synonyms
could destroy their family life
and
Punctuation problem
, and
show examples
the process of obtaining these details often requires wrongdoing.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
State your view clearly in the first line and keep to it.
task response
Give clear reasons and use examples that fit the point.
task response
Include a small counter point and show why you still agree.
coherence
Use clear links between ideas and use topic sentences.
coherence
Use simple linking words to show how ideas go with each other.
coherence
Make the intro and conclusion match the ideas in the body.
strength
The writer has a clear view and stays with it.
strength
The writer uses real events to back points.
strength
The essay is easy to read and follow.
Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Topic Vocabulary:
  • intrusion
  • accountability
  • transparency
  • sensationalism
  • privacy
  • public interest
  • collateral damage
  • precedent
  • responsible journalism
  • exploitation
  • democratic processes
  • media culture
  • balance
What to do next:
Look at other essays: