Elevated levels of 
 are included in numerous synthetic foods and drinks, which lead to a decline in health status. It is argued that one way to tackle 
 issue is through raising the cost of 
 . I strongly disagree with 
, because it has a low success rate and can be damaging to those who are not concerned.
 with, 
 raising the price of 
 containing 
 can be prohibitive to some people, 
 a policy 
 harms those who are leading a healthy lifestyle. Produces that contain 
 surely have adverse effects on the human body if taken in large amounts. 
, healthy individuals who take good measures to stay healthy often rely on the occasional consumption of 
 . 
 is because completely abstaining from eating or drinking processed 
 when following a healthy diet can lead to devastating effects in the long run. 
, a person developing their muscle mass through regular exercise will need to attend the gymnasium frequently over a long period of time, they 
 need to follow a strict diet that has no 
 included. If 
 person did not consume 
 every now and 
, they would lapse and start eating chocolates and drinking sodas in high amounts which would ruin their progress and ruin their healthy lifestyle.
, 
 of making sugary 
 more expensive, suppliers should opt to start campaigns that promote the side effects of 
 consumption. 
, local stores should include a warning label on the cover of these sugary goods that lists the drawbacks of 
. 
 would result in buyers  reconsidering their decision after reading these drawbacks. 
 approach is more favourable in reducing consumption when compared to increasing the cost. 
, raising the cost of processed foods and sugars would not be as effective because not everyone is financially responsible, 
, more individuals would buy these 
 first before regretting their decision after consuming it. 
, the elevated level of 
 found in numerous foods and beverages can have a negative impact on the health of individuals. 
 it is argued that increasing the expense of these 
 would hinder the amount of purchases, I completely disagree. 
 is because not only do 
 policies have a widespread impact, but a more targeted approach 
 as advocation through small labels on merchandise’s cover can be more effective.