It is considered that the authorities do not need to set any limitations for creative people like artists, who should have the ability to share their masterpieces using diverse forms of art depending on their own choice. I totally disagree for the following reasons.
First of all, giving full freedom to these masters of brush could harm the mental health of children. The reason is that artists might use various banned topics
such
as adults 18+, and murders, in order to attract more attention from society. To illustrate Linking Words
this
, the recent work of Judio Kardeneshi, who created a sculpture depicting the process of killing one person by another one, and put it in a public park. Linking Words
Thus
, kids could become more introverted and, eventually, can be filled with a strong fear of being killed by their mates or random strangers.
Linking Words
Moreover
, the mentioned painters could spoil the appearance of buildings. The source of Linking Words
this
arises from their desire to use as canvas the walls of well-known malls or houses to share their work of art with more people with ease. Linking Words
For instance
, there were plenty of occasions described in Kyiv news feeds about how young graffiti artists damaged the beauty of Linking Words
this
city by painting diverse buildings downtown without any agreements with the local government. Linking Words
This
could extremely damage the ancient facilities and Linking Words
as a result
, the number of foreign tourists might be lowered drastically.
In conclusion, if authorities ignore controlling ways of expressing artistic ideas Linking Words
this
might trigger tons of psychological issues in children's brains. Linking Words
Additionally
, the appearance of city architecture could be spoiled.Linking Words
alexey.denisiuk