Without a shadow of a doubt, animal extinctions are an alarming stage in the current era. Some contend to only protect creatures that are useful for humans. I completely disagree with
this
perspective and we should protect all Linking Words
species
of Use synonyms
animals
rather than only a few.
One school of thoughts hold that only useable Use synonyms
animals
should be protected. The main reason why I disagree with Use synonyms
this
notion is that bio-diversity will fluctuate and other Linking Words
species
will not survive because all Use synonyms
animals
have a role in humans and each other life. Use synonyms
For instance
, Linking Words
number
of bats Change the article
the number
are
decreasing rapidly and they eat insects. So, if Correct subject-verb agreement
is
this
creature sees extinction it means that the figure of insects will incline and they will destroy crops which will lead to economic decline. Linking Words
That is
why, one animal's loss will accompany many problems.
The opposite side of thought says that all creatures of nature should be protected. The strong multitudes of reasons they claim Linking Words
is
that protection of all the Change the verb form
are
species
will make a balance of biodiversity on our globe.They think any Use synonyms
animals
are not useful Use synonyms
while
every animal can be useful at any moment in future. Linking Words
Thus
, to protect these Linking Words
species
we have to stop deforestation, pollution and unusual burnings. Use synonyms
Hence
, all types of Linking Words
animals
are useful in either way.
Use synonyms
To conclude
, after analyzing both views I agree with the latter paragraph because without Linking Words
animals
there will be no human survival. So, it is our responsibility to cut these methods and make our future better.Use synonyms