In recent years, there have been ongoing debates about whether governments should spend money on public services or they ought to invest it in the
arts
. I believe that they should use it in the core infrastructure, because it develops the economy, and it is considered a basic need for all citizens, regardless of the country's development level.
Use synonyms
To begin
with, some people claim that authorities should invest more in public facilities can contribute to economic growth. Linking Words
In other words
, when a country enhances its Linking Words
healthcare
Use synonyms
system
, its workers' health will improve. Use synonyms
As a result
, they will support the economy because their efficiency has increased. A good example is Canada , where the Linking Words
healthcare
Use synonyms
system
is free. Not only will they enjoy their lives, but they Use synonyms
also
will not have to afford the financial burden of the Linking Words
healthcare
insurance.
Use synonyms
Moreover
, enhancing public services is considered an essential need for society. Linking Words
In other words
, the benefits of developing the educational Linking Words
system
are more than the benefits of developing the Use synonyms
arts
sectors. Use synonyms
For instance
, Germany has a competitive educational Linking Words
system
for free. Use synonyms
Thus
, what can be said is that education and Linking Words
healthcare
are crucial for any country as basic factors for development.
Use synonyms
To conclude
, by highlighting the above-mentioned points, Linking Words
although
all types of Linking Words
arts
are valuable for the society's culture, government-funded sectors are more important for the economy and for fulfilling essential needs. I claim that governments should spend funds more wisely by using them on core infrastructure, and Use synonyms
then
allocate the remaining on the Linking Words
arts
programs.Use synonyms