When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of like die. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent you agree or disagree with the statement? You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your argument with examples and relevant evidence.

When a country advances its technology, some people believe that traditional

skills

Use synonyms

and lifestyles disappear, and it is useless to preserve them. I partly agree with

this

Linking Words

statement because

while

Linking Words

some traditional ways may become outdated, many still hold value and should be protected. On the one hand, it is true that modern technology replaces many old

skills

Use synonyms

.

For example

Linking Words

, people used to make clothes by hand, but now machines do it faster and cheaper.

Similarly

Linking Words

, traditional farming methods are replaced by machines and chemicals, which produce more food. In

this

Linking Words

way, some traditional techniques become less useful and are forgotten, especially among the younger generation who prefer modern tools.

However

Linking Words

, I do not think it is pointless to try and save these traditions. Many old

skills

Use synonyms

, like making pottery, weaving, or traditional medicine, are part of a country’s culture and history. They

also

Linking Words

attract tourists, which helps the economy.

For example

Linking Words

, in Uzbekistan, traditional silk weaving is still practised and brings many visitors.

Also

Linking Words

, some old ways of living, like organic farming, are now seen as better for the environment and are being used again. In conclusion,

while

Linking Words

it is natural that some traditional

skills

Use synonyms

fade as technology grows, they still have cultural and economic value.

Therefore

Linking Words

, we should try to keep them alive, even in a modern society.