Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivataion for commiting it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both thee view and give your opinion.

In the contemporary world, a large proportion of individuals contend that punishments for crimes should be fixed,
while
Linking Words
others highlight the opposite, considering the fairness and deterrence associated with each.
This
Linking Words
essay will discuss both perspectives.
While
Linking Words
fixed sentencing promotes deterrence and consistency, I contend discretionary approach is more crucial in aligning the punishment with the moral weight of crime. On the one hand, fixed punishments seem to contribute the society more convenience and are able to deter crime in the most effective way.
For example
Linking Words
, draconian laws in ancient China, harsh repercussions
such
Linking Words
as severing the hands of people
due to
Linking Words
theft , not only disregarded the complexity of individual situations but
also
Linking Words
violated fundamental human rights.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, sentencing and judging the perpetrators from the perspective of predetermined sanctions will foster an unfair law framework , and some wealthy criminals who have the power to get lighter punishment will lead to potentially repeated offences, indeed.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, in charge of ensuring fairness and applying the laws with flexibility. Not all crimes are committed with malicious intent.
For example
Linking Words
, there can be a crime that has been committed because of self-defence;
likewise
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
kind of offence needs to be distinguished from premeditated action.A flexible legal framework allows judges to differentiate between crimes committed with nefarious intent and those driven by external pressures, ensuring a more balanced and humane approach to justice. In conclusion,
whereas
Linking Words
some argue that predetermined punishments are better to deter homicide and contribute to society a consistency, criminals need to be subjected to sentence judgmentally by authorities based on the specific case.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

language
Fix the small grammar errors and make the flow clear. For example, change 'more convenience' to 'more convenient for society' and 'apply flexiblity' to 'apply flexibility'.
content
Add more clear points for each side. Give one strong point on fixed punishments and one strong point on flexible sentencing, then finish with your view.
structure
Use shorter sentences. Short lines help, and put a topic sentence in each paragraph.
content
The essay shows a view from both sides and has an opinion.
coherence
There are clear sign words like 'On the one hand' and 'On the other hand'.
examples
There is an example about old China which supports your point.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • consistency
  • fairness
  • deterrence
  • bias
  • discrimination
  • nuanced
  • rehabilitation
  • re-offending rates
  • tailored sentencing
  • judicial discretion
  • minimum sentences
  • hybrid approach
What to do next:
Look at other essays: