Rich countries should not give jobs to skilled workers (for example doctors and engineers )of poor countries as they are needed their home country more than the rich countries. How far do you agree or disagree with the statement given?

In recent years, the question of whether experienced professionals, including doctors, engineers, and scientists, should be prevented from migrating to developed nations has sparked a contentious debate.

While

Linking Words

some people believe that skilled personnel have an obligation to serve their home countries, others contend that restricting them would infringe upon their liberty and curtail their opportunities to flourish.

This

Linking Words

essay fully supports the latter view and will provide compelling reasons.

To begin

Linking Words

with, professional migrants often seek a higher standard of living and broader prospects for their families, who frequently remain in their native states. Working abroad can refine their expertise and, in turn, boost their earning potential, enabling them to remit more funds back home.

For example

Linking Words

, research findings revealed that 67% of income generated overseas is channelled to other nations through remittances sent by international employees.

Consequently

Linking Words

, these professionals not only advance their own competencies and financial stability but

also

Linking Words

make a measurable contribution to the economic growth of their countries of origin.

Moreover

Linking Words

, denying individuals their inherent right to autonomy constitutes a serious breach of human rights. Forcing people to stay in their homelands, thereby preventing them from pursuing their aspirations, is considered self-serving and exploitative. As an illustration, in Kuwait, statistics indicated that since the introduction of a comprehensive ban on allowing specialists to move to wealthier states, 78% have lost ambition and motivation to improve, leading to a significant loss of valuable human capital without any tangible gain for the less affluent nation. In conclusion,

although

Linking Words

many economically disadvantaged states may wish to retain their highly trained citizens, it does not give authorities the right to compel them to remain, as

such

Linking Words

measures squander talent and undermine basic human rights. I am firmly convinced that protecting freedom of choice is essential to ensuring both personal fulfilment and broader societal progress.