Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivataion for commiting it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It has become far more normal for some people to think that there should be a mandatory penalty for all crimes. Others,
in contrast
Linking Words
, argue that the conditions of a specific crime and the reason for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the sanction.
This
Linking Words
essay will explore both perspectives with clear examples before giving a personal viewpoint. On the one hand, one key reason for prioritising the use of fixed sentences helps to reduce crime among people.
That is
Linking Words
to say, when these laws are introduced, individuals become more afraid of the consequences of an offence.
For example
Linking Words
, in Spanish, the death penalty has been established, so the number of wrongdoings has declined in society.
As a result
Linking Words
, the set penalty should be prophylaxis. If it were not for strict retribution, the infractions would be disruptive to the community. Given that if we try to restrict illegality, citizens will be encouraged to work honestly.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, the main reason why each criminal act leads to different situations. Namely, if a person steals because of starvation,
this
Linking Words
act should not be considered as severe as other violations.
For instance
Linking Words
, some nations take into account mitigating circumstances.
As a consequence
Linking Words
, these acts supply justice and influence others more positive way. If it were not for justifying conditions, there would be disagreements among inhabitants.
To sum up
Linking Words
, I would say that not only does just punishment punish crimes, but it
also
Linking Words
helps resocialization into social life.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Response
State your view clearly in the introduction and restate it in the conclusion to show a strong stance.
Grammar
Use short, clear sentences. Fix big grammar errors to make meaning easy.
Coherence
Use simple linking words to show how ideas connect (for example, on the one hand, however, in addition).
Content
Give at least one clear example for each view, and make sure each example supports your point.
Structure
Make sure your conclusion sums up your view and the main ideas.
Task Response
You address both sides of the issue, not just one side.
Coherence
There is a plan sentence that tells the reader what you will do.
Coherence
Some linking words help to connect ideas.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Topic Vocabulary:
  • consistency
  • fairness
  • deterrence
  • bias
  • discrimination
  • nuanced
  • rehabilitation
  • re-offending rates
  • tailored sentencing
  • judicial discretion
  • minimum sentences
  • hybrid approach
What to do next:
Look at other essays: