It has become far more normal for some people to think that there should be a mandatory penalty for all crimes. Others,
in contrast
, argue that the conditions of a specific crime and the reason for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the sanction. Linking Words
This
essay will explore both perspectives with clear examples before giving a personal viewpoint.
On the one hand, one key reason for prioritising the use of fixed sentences helps to reduce crime among people. Linking Words
That is
to say, when these laws are introduced, individuals become more afraid of the consequences of an offence. Linking Words
For example
, in Spanish, the death penalty has been established, so the number of wrongdoings has declined in society. Linking Words
As a result
, the set penalty should be prophylaxis. If it were not for strict retribution, the infractions would be disruptive to the community. Given that if we try to restrict illegality, citizens will be encouraged to work honestly.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the main reason why each criminal act leads to different situations. Namely, if a person steals because of starvation, Linking Words
this
act should not be considered as severe as other violations. Linking Words
For instance
, some nations take into account mitigating circumstances. Linking Words
As a consequence
, these acts supply justice and influence others more positive way. If it were not for justifying conditions, there would be disagreements among inhabitants.
Linking Words
To sum up
, I would say that not only does just punishment punish crimes, but it Linking Words
also
helps resocialization into social life.Linking Words