It is believed that
zoos
should be banned because it is inhuman to keep Use synonyms
animals
in cages, but other Use synonyms
people
think that it can be helpful for the conservation of endangered Use synonyms
species
. I will discuss both views Use synonyms
along with
my opinion in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, keeping Linking Words
animals
in captivity affects them mentally. These wild Use synonyms
animals
are not naturally developed to be habituated in small cages. especially a big-sized creature, Use synonyms
such
as a Tiger and a bear. They need to be physically active, which is not possible in a small area. Linking Words
For instance
, it has been seen in many wild bears that they become depressed and more aggressive in the wild sanctuaries and die before their natural age.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, Linking Words
Zoos
help to protect many endangered Use synonyms
species
, but Use synonyms
also
spread awareness and provide economic benefits. There are many Linking Words
species
that are not possible to conserve in a natural environment, like in a forest, Use synonyms
such
as the Panda. So Linking Words
zoos
are an absolute place to keep them safe. Use synonyms
Apart from
Linking Words
this
, Linking Words
zoos
help to educate Use synonyms
people
about the importance of wildlife and provide regional economic benefits by creating jobs and through visitors. Use synonyms
For example
, there is a big national park open in the capital of India, visited by thousands of Linking Words
people
every day, and Use synonyms
people
are working inside as cleaners and guides.
In conclusion, Use synonyms
while
sheltering wild Linking Words
animals
can be detrimental for them, it can Use synonyms
also
be an effective solution to save a number of Linking Words
species
from extinction and certainly help to boost the local economy.Use synonyms