Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that the personal
details
Use synonyms
of political figures should not be made public through the print media. I completely agree with
this
Linking Words
statement, as it would promote the politicians' mental health and provide security for# their family life. To start with, information about dignitaries should not be published, because it would positively affect one’s mindset. These personalities have a busy work schedule, often involving nationwide travelling. When they are back home, they demand privacy away from the media. By publishing
details
Use synonyms
of their whereabouts, they could become easy targets for public criticism, which could affect their mental well-being.
For instance
Linking Words
, Princess Diana was the subject of criticism because of her strained relationship with Prince Charles, and the media played a huge role in the decline of her mental health.
Secondly
Linking Words
, refraining from publishing
details
Use synonyms
about politicians' private lives would safeguard the security of their families, who are not public figures. When newspapers reveal personal information
such
Linking Words
as home addresses, daily routines, or holiday locations, family members can become vulnerable to harassment, stalking, or threats from opponents or criminals.
For instance
Linking Words
, if a tabloid publishes a politician’s family vacation destination and itinerary, it could enable malicious individuals to track and target innocent children or spouses, causing heightened anxiety and the need for extra security. Protecting
such
Linking Words
details
Use synonyms
is essential to preventing real dangers. In conclusion, the sensitive information associated with the leader’s life should be kept safe
as
Punctuation problem
, as
show examples
it enhances the mental well-being of the politicians and keeps the family secure.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Response guidance
State your view clearly at the start and keep it steady through the essay.
Task Response guidance
Give more detail for each idea and add more real examples.
Coherence and Cohesion guidance
Use linking words to show how ideas fit and help flow.
Coherence and Cohesion guidance
End with a clear restate of your view in the closing.
strength
Clear view of the topic.
strength
Good use of examples to back points.
strength
Overall structure with intro, body, and conclusion.
Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • intrusion
  • accountability
  • transparency
  • sensationalism
  • privacy
  • public interest
  • collateral damage
  • precedent
  • responsible journalism
  • exploitation
  • democratic processes
  • media culture
  • balance
What to do next:
Look at other essays: