IELTS Writing Correction Service
Writing Samples
Band 8

It is the responsibility of individuals to save and provide for their own retirement. Governments have no obligation to provide this benefit. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
In
this
Linking Words
 modern era, financial security after
retirement
Use synonyms
 has become the subject of considerable debate. Some people argue that
individuals
Use synonyms
 should be entirely responsible for accumulating sufficient savings for old age and that governments have no duty to provide pension benefits. I partially disagree with
this
Linking Words
 view because personal
retirement
Use synonyms
 planning promotes financial independence,
whereas
Linking Words
 state support is indispensable for protecting elderly citizens who are unable to save adequately.
Body paragraph 1
To begin
Linking Words
 with, there are compelling reasons why
individuals
Use synonyms
 should assume primary responsibility for their
retirement
Use synonyms
. By contributing regularly to pension funds and investment accounts, people cultivate prudent financial habits and reduce their dependence on public assistance.
Moreover
Linking Words
, personal savings enable workers to maintain a standard of living that reflects their income and long-term aspirations.
For example
Linking Words
, many employees in Canada and the United States contribute to employer-sponsored
retirement
Use synonyms
 plans;
as a result
Linking Words
, they accumulate substantial funds over several decades. Not only does
this
Linking Words
 approach encourage self-reliance, but it
also
Linking Words
 reduces pressure on government budgets.
Consequently
Linking Words
, individual saving can provide both financial security and greater autonomy in later life.
Body paragraph 2
However
Linking Words
, governments should still guarantee a basic level of support for retired citizens.
While
Linking Words
 some
individuals
Use synonyms
 earn sufficient incomes throughout their careers, others face unemployment, chronic illness, or low-paying jobs and
therefore
Linking Words
 lack the capacity to save enough. Without a public pension system, these people could experience severe financial hardship in old age.
For instance
Linking Words
, countries
such
Linking Words
 as Sweden and the Netherlands provide state pensions that ensure all retirees can afford essential expenses, including housing and healthcare.
In addition
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
 safety net narrows social inequality and preserves human dignity.
For
Linking Words
this
Linking Words
 reason, a balanced system in which personal savings are supplemented by government assistance is both equitable and sustainable.
Conclusion
In conclusion,
although
Linking Words
individuals
Use synonyms
 ought to prepare financially for
retirement
Use synonyms
, governments should not abandon their responsibility to support vulnerable older citizens. The most effective approach is one that combines personal responsibility with a publicly funded safety net, thereby ensuring financial stability and a dignified standard of living for all retirees.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your view is clear: people should plan for old age, but the state should help those in need. To make the answer even stronger, say more clearly that the state should give a basic payment, not pay for every person's full old-age needs.
task response
Your main ideas are well explained. You could add one short real example of a person who cannot save, such as a low-paid worker or someone who is ill for many years. This would make the point feel more real.
task response
The examples of Canada, the United States, Sweden, and the Netherlands fit your ideas. Be careful with broad claims such as people building large funds or all old people being able to pay for all key costs; use softer words like “may” or “can” when needed.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear shape: an opening, one paragraph for personal saving, one for state help, and a final answer. Keep using this plan.
coherence and cohesion
Links between ideas are clear, with words such as “Moreover,” “However,” “For example,” and “Consequently.” Try not to use too many link words in one paragraph; at times, a simple full stop gives the reader a better break.
coherence and cohesion
Each body paragraph stays on one main point and ends by tying that point back to the main view. For an even smoother flow, begin the second paragraph with a direct link to the limit of the first point, such as: “Yet personal saving is not possible for everyone.”
task response
You answer all parts of the question and give a clear, balanced view from the first paragraph to the end.
task response
Your reasons are strong and easy to follow: saving builds independence, while state help protects people who cannot save enough.
coherence and cohesion
Your opening and final paragraph match well. The final paragraph gives a direct answer and restates the main plan in a clear way.
coherence and cohesion
Your examples are placed after the ideas they support, so the reader can see why each example matters.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • retirement savings
  • financial planning
  • economic circumstances
  • government provision
  • basic state pension
  • financial independence
  • income disparities
  • aging populations
  • social safety net
  • tax burden
  • financial education
  • quality of life
  • personal financial responsibility
  • social inequality
What to do next:
Look at other essays: