There is a belief that every unlawful act ought to be punished with a specific penalty.
On the other hand
, others claim that the circumstances of the Linking Words
crime
and the criminal's motive should be considered when deciding the appropriate punishment. Use synonyms
This
essay will discuss both views and give the writer's opinion.
Linking Words
To begin
with, assigning punishments without a thorough assessment can cut down red tape in the Linking Words
prison
system. By skipping the assessment of the specific Use synonyms
crime
and the wrongdoer's intention, the process will take less time because it will not include investigations, justifications, and closing arguments during the trial process. Use synonyms
Moreover
, the allocation of convicted individuals would be less complicated, as judges would not have to sort them into groups based on age and the severity of the Linking Words
crime
. Use synonyms
Consequently
, Linking Words
prison
wardens would guard fewer Use synonyms
prison
cells, and there would be less manpower needed to operate the Use synonyms
prison
. Use synonyms
For instance
, wardens would guard fewer cells because prisoners would be divided into fewer categories.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the contrasting view can promote equity and fairness for convicts. By contemplating the circumstances of the felony, the courts can reach an accurate conclusion and assign suitable sentences. Linking Words
This
can mitigate the impact of misjudgement. Linking Words
For example
, by resorting to an assessment of the circumstances of the wrongdoing, guilty individuals who are young can receive more favourable penalties than those who are adults.
In conclusion, both choices have their merits and demerits. Linking Words
However
, taking account of the Linking Words
crime
's severity and other factors, Use synonyms
such
as the convict's intention, outweighs assigning everyone the same specific penalty, as it enables fairness in the Linking Words
prison
system.Use synonyms