Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, sink this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on Earth. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
In the modern world,
space
Use synonyms
exploration has become an increasingly important issue.
While
Linking Words
some people believe that governments should spend money on exploring other
planets
Use synonyms
, others argue that
this
Linking Words
is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on
Earth
Use synonyms
.
This
Linking Words
essay will discuss both views before giving my opinion. On the one hand, investing in other
planets
Use synonyms
offers a multitude of benefits that extend far beyond mere scientific discoveries, drive technological innovation, and improve human life.
Firstly
Linking Words
,
space
Use synonyms
exploration can lead to important scientific discoveries and technological advances.
For example
Linking Words
, research conducted for
space
Use synonyms
missions has contributed to advances in communication, medicine and transportation.
Secondly
Linking Words
,
Earth
Use synonyms
has limited natural resources, and discovering resources on other
planets
Use synonyms
could benefit humanity in the future.
Consequently
Linking Words
, the government should
also
Linking Words
invest in the search for life on other
planets
Use synonyms
to capitalise on those benefits.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, critics of the funding argue that the government should prioritise immediate global crises. The
Earth
Use synonyms
is currently facing serious challenges
such
Linking Words
as poverty, disease, and climate change. Spending thousands of dollars to search for extraterrestrial life is a highly speculative endeavour that may never yield results; it
also
Linking Words
seems impractical given that millions of people lack basic necessities
such
Linking Words
as clean water and healthcare services.
Therefore
Linking Words
, opponents argue that the funds would be better spent domestically—supporting struggling families and protecting the environment—to stabilise lives in the immediate term. In conclusion, both perspectives have their merits.
However
Linking Words
, I believe that
while
Linking Words
governments must prioritise addressing crises here on
Earth
Use synonyms
, they should still allocate a reasonable and balanced budget to
space
Use synonyms
exploration.
This
Linking Words
approach ensures that today's problems are addressed without sacrificing tomorrow's scientific progress.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Overall score: 7. To reach 8, make each main idea more fully explained. For example, say how space work has helped medicine or communication, not just that it has helped.
task response
The example is quite general. Add one real or clear example. For instance, you could say that space tools can help people watch storms, fires, and changes in the weather.
task response
The point about resources on other planets is possible, but it is far away and not strongly linked to looking for life. Explain this link more clearly, or use a closer point, such as learning more about Earth and its place in space.
task response
Your opinion is clear, but give a little more detail about what a “reasonable and balanced budget” means. For example: most money should go to clean water, health, and climate action, while a small part can go to space work.
coherence and cohesion
Your first body paragraph has one long first sentence. It joins too many ideas together. Split it into two short sentences so the reader can follow it more easily.
coherence and cohesion
Some links between ideas could be smoother. After the first point about science, add a short line to show why this matters for public money before moving to resources.
coherence and cohesion
Use fewer set linking words if they do not add meaning. Your links are good, but clear topic sentences and full explanation are more important than many link words.
task response
You discuss both sides and give your own view clearly. Your view is also in the end: solve Earth’s problems first, but still give some money to space work.
task response
Your main ideas are on topic: new science and future resources on one side; poverty, health, and climate change on the other.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear four-part shape: start, first view, second view, and end.
coherence and cohesion
Linking words such as “On the one hand”, “Firstly”, “Secondly”, “On the other hand”, and “However” make the order easy to follow.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • unprecedented opportunities
  • extraterrestrial
  • satisfy human curiosity
  • practical benefits
  • inspiring goal
  • testament to human ambition
  • pursuit of knowledge
  • critics argue
  • imprudent
  • plague Earth
  • immediate attention
  • allocated for
  • environmental conservation
  • well-being
  • quality of life
  • balanced approach
  • advancements
  • benefits for humanity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: