In many countries, a small countries od people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governmnets should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any revelant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
In many countries, a relatively small proportion of
people
Use synonyms
earn exceptionally high
salaries
Use synonyms
.
While
Linking Words
some argue that
such
Linking Words
substantial incomes benefit society and the national economy, others believe that
governments
Use synonyms
should impose a maximum limit on individual earnings.
This
Linking Words
essay will examine both perspectives before arguing that,
although
Linking Words
excessive inequality can be problematic,
governments
Use synonyms
should generally avoid setting an upper salary limit. On the one hand, allowing
people
Use synonyms
to earn very high incomes can provide significant economic benefits. In competitive industries, substantial
salaries
Use synonyms
can attract talented professionals and encourage individuals to acquire valuable skills, work harder and take greater risks.
For example
Linking Words
, highly qualified doctors, engineers and technology specialists may be more likely to remain in a country if they can receive internationally competitive remuneration.
Moreover
Linking Words
, successful entrepreneurs and business leaders often generate employment and investment, meaning that their personal wealth can contribute indirectly to broader economic growth. High
salaries
Use synonyms
can
therefore
Linking Words
act as an incentive for innovation, productivity and entrepreneurship.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, extremely large differences in income can create serious social problems. When a small minority accumulates enormous wealth
while
Linking Words
ordinary workers struggle to meet basic living costs,
people
Use synonyms
may perceive the economic system as fundamentally unfair.
This
Linking Words
can contribute to social tension and reduce public trust in institutions.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, excessive concentrations of wealth may give affluent individuals disproportionate political and economic influence. For these reasons, some
people
Use synonyms
believe that
governments
Use synonyms
should prevent
salaries
Use synonyms
from exceeding a predetermined level and redistribute surplus income to fund public services
such
Linking Words
as healthcare and education. In my view,
however
Linking Words
, imposing a legal ceiling on
salaries
Use synonyms
would be unnecessarily restrictive and could have unintended consequences. Rather than limiting how much
people
Use synonyms
can earn,
governments
Use synonyms
should use progressive taxation to ensure that those with the greatest financial capacity make a proportionately larger contribution to society.
This
Linking Words
approach preserves the incentive to work, innovate and invest
while
Linking Words
simultaneously reducing extreme inequality. In conclusion, very high
salaries
Use synonyms
can encourage talent, innovation and economic development,
whereas
Linking Words
excessive income inequality can undermine social cohesion. I
therefore
Linking Words
believe that progressive taxation and effective public spending are preferable to imposing an absolute limit on individual earnings.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Add one more clear real-world example. For example, say how higher tax on very high pay could help pay for schools or hospitals in one country. This would make your ideas feel more real and strong.
task response
Explain a little more why a pay limit may cause harm. For example, top workers may move to another country, or firms may find other ways to give them money.
coherence and cohesion
Your paragraphs are clear, but some long sentences have many ideas. Split a few of them into two shorter sentences so the main point is easier to follow.
coherence and cohesion
Use a small number of simple links inside each paragraph to show cause and result, such as “because”, “so”, and “as a result”. This can make the flow even smoother.
task response
You discuss both sides clearly and give your own view. Your main idea is clear: high pay can help growth, but tax is better than a fixed pay limit.
task response
Your reasons are on topic and well explained. The points about skilled workers, jobs, fairness, and public services all fit the question.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear shape: opening, one paragraph for each view, your view, and a short ending.
coherence and cohesion
Links such as “On the one hand”, “On the other hand”, “Moreover”, and “In conclusion” guide the reader well.
Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example
What to do next:
Look at other essays: