In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
Due to
Linking Words
most countries
adapting
Verb problem
adopting
show examples
a capitalistic ideology, we have seen
an
Correct article usage
a
show examples
rise in
people
Use synonyms
making an incredible sum of money.
This
Linking Words
in
Punctuation problem
, in
show examples
return gets quite a few different opinions
,
Punctuation problem
apply
show examples
on whether it's positive or negative for
people
Use synonyms
to achieve
such
Linking Words
high salaries. On
one
Use synonyms
hand,
people
Use synonyms
argue that
this
Linking Words
helps countries to develop economically, but
on the other hand
Linking Words
, we have those who feel that
this
Linking Words
is unfair, and plead with the governments to put a limit on how much
one
Use synonyms
can earn.
Overall
Linking Words
, it's quite hard to decide which side is right, but I think we should praise creative
people
Use synonyms
and let them be
awarded
Verb problem
rewarded
show examples
for their ingenuity
instead
Linking Words
of punishing them and limiting their monetary gain, so that the rest of us can earn as much as them.
Body paragraph 1
Firstly
Linking Words
, most
people
Use synonyms
earn these high salaries
due to
Linking Words
their perseverance and brilliant ideas.
For instance
Linking Words
, Bill Gates
who
Punctuation problem
, who
show examples
has founded Microsoft, not only worked on his project for a decade until he
has seen
Wrong verb form
saw
show examples
success, but
also
Linking Words
donates a huge sum of his
earning
Replace the word
earnings
to charity. So why should we punish those like him who dedicate their life to their passions, which
also
Linking Words
pay taxes like the rest of us, that in return helps the countries economically? In conclusion, I believe that these hard workers should be praised for how much they contribute to society
instead
Linking Words
of
,
Punctuation problem
apply
show examples
stripping them of their monetary value.
Body paragraph 2
Following up, we have the solid argument that they don't require so much
economical
Replace the word
economic
freedom, that
people
Use synonyms
with a fraction of what they earn are struggling just to survive. To illustrate, the resources held by the top
one
Use synonyms
percent
Change the spelling
per cent
show examples
are more than enough to completely fund housing and support systems for most homeless
people
Use synonyms
.
While
Linking Words
it would definitely be a huge help,
i
Fix capitalization
I
show examples
think those who
ended
Wrong verb form
end
show examples
up
the
Change preposition
on the
show examples
street have little to no societal impact. So
in
Punctuation problem
, in
show examples
conclusion, would we really be making the right choice, or just helping those who do not wish to be helped?
Conclusion
In summary, it is quite hard to fully support just
one
Use synonyms
side, as they both have solid arguments. But as I see it, we would only damage our society if we were to strip the financial earnings of those who earned
it
Fix the agreement mistake
them
show examples
. In general,
i
Fix capitalization
I
show examples
recommend that we should still attempt to help others with just a fraction of the overwhelming resources that some
posses
Correct your spelling
possess
, to
analyze
Change the spelling
analyse
show examples
if it has any positive outcomes, and if
this
Linking Words
fails
we
Punctuation problem
, we
show examples
should continue as is.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Give a more even discussion of both views. The first view is explained in more detail, but the view about a pay limit needs a stronger reason and a clearer example.
task response
Your main view is not fully steady. You say very high pay should not be limited, but you also say some of this money should be used to help others. State clearly how this should happen: by choice, by tax, or by a law.
task response
Avoid saying that people without homes have “little to no societal impact” or may not want help. This is too broad and is not supported. Instead, explain that some people need housing, health care, or job help.
task response
Use examples that directly answer the question. For example, explain how very high pay can push people to create new goods and jobs, and how a pay limit or higher tax could help pay for schools, health care, or housing.
coherence and cohesion
Keep one main idea in each body paragraph. The first body paragraph should explain why high pay can be good. The second should explain why some people want a limit. Then give your view in the last paragraph.
coherence and cohesion
Do not use “In conclusion” in the middle of the essay. Save it for the final paragraph. In body paragraphs, use simple links like “Also”, “However”, “For this reason”, and “As a result”.
coherence and cohesion
Make the link between ideas clearer. For example, after the Bill Gates example, explain exactly how his company helps a country: it creates jobs, pays tax, and makes useful tools.
coherence and cohesion
Use clear topic sentences. For example: “Supporters of high salaries say they reward hard work and new ideas.” Then: “Others believe very high salaries make the gap between rich and poor too large.”
task response
You discuss both views and give your own view clearly. You also use examples, such as Bill Gates and people without homes.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay has a clear start, body parts, and an ending. Words such as “Firstly”, “For instance”, and “In summary” help the reader follow your ideas.
Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • incentivize
  • discrepancy
  • inequality
  • social cohesion
  • equitable distribution
  • wealth concentration
  • talent retention
  • global competitiveness
  • social unrest
  • innovate
  • government intervention
  • salary cap
What to do next:
Look at other essays: