In many countries, plastic bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore, they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
It is widely believed that synthetic carrier
bags
Use synonyms
cause a major portion of municipal waste and inflict severe ecological damage on both land and water bodies. It is frequently suggested that they must be outlawed. I firmly agree that implementing an outright ban on these items is a necessary measure to protect global ecosystems.
Body paragraph 1
Plastic
Use synonyms
bags
Use synonyms
damage marine and land ecosystems because they persist for centuries and injure wildlife through ingestion or entanglement. These
bags
Use synonyms
do not break down easily, so they stay in nature for a very long time and become a serious danger.
For example
Linking Words
, the documentary film by BBC Earth shows that many marine species,
such
Linking Words
as sea turtles and seabirds, wash ashore with stomachs full of non-biodegradable
plastic
Use synonyms
fragments.
This
Linking Words
clearly proves that
plastic
Use synonyms
packets harm animals and pollute both oceans and land.
Body paragraph 2
In addition
Linking Words
, banning
plastic
Use synonyms
bags
Use synonyms
drives widespread behavioural shifts and forces consumers and businesses to adopt sustainable, eco-friendly alternatives like cloth or biodegradable
bags
Use synonyms
. When governments restrict these carriers, people start using reusable options
and
Punctuation problem
, and
show examples
companies
also
Linking Words
change their habits. A good real-life example is Singapore’s nationwide ban on single-use
plastic
Use synonyms
bags
Use synonyms
introduced twenty years ago.
This
Linking Words
policy successfully transformed the country into one of the cleanest and most environmentally conscious nations in Asia.
Such
Linking Words
a ban can
therefore
Linking Words
create a greener lifestyle for everyone.
Conclusion
In
conclusion
Add a comma
conclusion,
show examples
environmental degradation caused by non-biodegradable waste has become one of the most pressing crises of the modern era.
Plastic
Use synonyms
carriers,
in particular
Linking Words
, are notorious for clogging landfills and polluting natural habitats. I absolutely agree with the idea of prohibiting single-use
plastic
Use synonyms
packages, as they can harm wildlife and banning them leads us to a cleaner future.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task response
Your view is clear from the start and stays the same. To make it stronger, explain why a full ban is better than other steps, such as a tax, better waste care, or limits on some kinds of bags.
Task response
Your first main point is useful, but the link to land could be clearer. Say how bags harm land animals, block drains, or stay in soil for many years.
Task response
Be careful with facts in examples. The claim about a long-term nationwide ban in Singapore may not be correct. Use a fact you are sure about, or give a more general example of a place that cut bag use.
Coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear shape: opening, two main parts, and an ending. Each main part has one key idea, which makes it easy to follow.
Coherence and cohesion
Some ideas repeat the same point. For example, the first main part says that bags stay in nature for a long time in two close sentences. Join these ideas and use the space to add a new detail.
Coherence and cohesion
Use links with care. Phrases such as “For example”, “In addition”, and “In conclusion” work well. You can also make links smoother by saying exactly how one idea leads to the next.
Coherence and cohesion
Add a comma after “In conclusion” in the last part. Also, keep the key term the same: use “plastic bags” more often instead of changing it to “carriers”, “packets”, and “packages”.
Task response
You answer the question fully by clearly agreeing with a ban and giving two main reasons: harm to animals and a move to reusable bags.
Task response
The sea turtle and seabird example helps show the harm caused by plastic waste.
Coherence and cohesion
Your opening clearly gives your view, and your ending returns to that same view.
Coherence and cohesion
The order of ideas is clear and easy to follow, with one part on harm and one part on change in daily use.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: