Some people believe that the government should spend more money on public transportation, while others think it should focus on improving roads for private vehicles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

7.0 / 9
✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
The allocation of state expenditure on transport infrastructure remains a contentious policy issue.
While
Linking Words
proponents of private vehicle infrastructure argue that upgraded roads stimulate commerce and offer personal mobility, I believe that
prioritizing
Change the spelling
prioritising
show examples
public
transit
Use synonyms
is a far more sustainable and equitable long-term strategy for urban development.
Body paragraph 1
Advocates of expanding road networks point to economic efficiency and personal convenience. In many regional or suburban contexts, public
transit
Use synonyms
networks cannot economically reach every household. For these communities, private automobiles remain essential for commuting and accessing vital services.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, commercial freight relies almost entirely on highways to distribute goods from industrial ports to regional distribution
centers
Change the spelling
centres
show examples
. When arterial highways suffer from severe bottlenecks, supply chains slow down, creating measurable economic drag. Expanding lane capacity and smoothing bypass routes can alleviate freight delays and accommodate workers whose schedules require flexible personal travel.
Body paragraph 2
Conversely
Linking Words
, investing heavily in public transportation yields decisive environmental and societal dividends. Modern urban
centers
Change the spelling
centres
show examples
face chronic air pollution and gridlock, neither of which road expansion resolves. Urban transport studies demonstrate the principle of "induced demand," where building wider highways simply attracts additional motorists, returning traffic to capacity within years.
In contrast
Linking Words
, high-capacity commuter rail, electric metro lines, and dedicated bus rapid
transit
Use synonyms
(BRT) move thousands of passengers per hour using a fraction of the land area and energy per capita. A well-integrated mass
transit
Use synonyms
system lowers urban carbon emissions, reduces reliance on imported fossil fuels, and democratizes mobility for lower-income demographics who cannot afford vehicle ownership, maintenance, and insurance.
Conclusion
In my view,
prioritizing
Change the spelling
prioritising
show examples
mass
transit
Use synonyms
generates greater societal return on investment. Road expansion creates a vicious cycle of urban sprawl and automobile dependency,
whereas
Linking Words
efficient metro and bus systems drive compact, walkable economic development around
transit
Use synonyms
hubs.
While
Linking Words
existing roads require baseline maintenance to ensure cargo flow and safety, the lion's share of infrastructure capital should target clean, reliable public transport networks to build resilient, accessible modern cities.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
You answer all parts of the question. You discuss roads for private cars, explain the good points of public transport, and give a clear view. To make the answer even stronger, add one real example from a city or your own life, such as a bus or train system that cut traffic.
task response
Your main ideas are clear and well explained. The points about jobs, goods, air, traffic, and people with less money all support your view. Keep making sure that each main point has a short, clear example or fact.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay is very easy to follow. The first main part shows the road view, the next main part shows the public transport view, and the last part gives your own view. This order works very well.
coherence and cohesion
You use linking words well, such as “Furthermore”, “Conversely”, “In contrast”, and “While”. You could also use a few simpler links, such as “For example”, “As a result”, and “This means”, to keep the flow natural.
coherence and cohesion
Each paragraph has one clear main idea and develops it fully. The last paragraph also gives a good balance: roads still need care, but most new money should go to public transport.
task response
Your opinion is clear from the start and stays the same through the essay: public transport should come first.
task response
The discussion is balanced. You give fair reasons for better roads, including travel needs in areas far from city centers and the movement of goods.
coherence and cohesion
The opening and ending work very well together. The ending clearly restates your view and sums up the key reason for it.
coherence and cohesion
Your ideas connect smoothly. The move from the road view to the public transport view is clear and easy to understand.
Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • public transportation
  • private vehicles
  • traffic congestion
  • rush-hour traffic
  • reliable bus services
  • metro network
  • rail infrastructure
  • affordable fares
  • reduce car dependency
  • commute to work
  • air pollution
  • carbon emissions
  • road maintenance
  • repair potholes
  • road safety
  • traffic accidents
  • rural areas
  • transport network
  • delivery of goods
  • sustainable urban transport
What to do next:
Look at other essays: