As housing is a basic need for people, the government should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

8.5 / 9
✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
It is often argued that governments should give a free home to every citizen who cannot afford one, given that shelter is as basic a need as food.
While
Linking Words
I accept that nobody should be left homeless, I largely disagree with
this
Linking Words
view, as the cost would damage other public services, and the gift itself weakens people's motivation to support themselves.
Body paragraph 1
Admittedly, the case for state housing is not without merit. The most obvious point is that a family with no stable address cannot hold down a job or keep children in school, so poverty passes from one generation to the next. In Morocco,
for instance
Linking Words
, the government paid for new flats to replace the slums of Casablanca, and the families who moved in sent their children to school far more regularly than before. That security allowed the parents to plan ahead
instead
Linking Words
of merely surviving.
Body paragraph 2
Nevertheless
Linking Words
, providing homes at no cost to everyone in need is the wrong solution. The most important reason is money because building and maintaining millions of properties would absorb the budget that hospitals, schools and roads depend on. If that budget shrank, every citizen would suffer. The estates on the edge of Rabat,
for example
Linking Words
, were built with public funds and handed over free, but within ten years the state had to pay again to repair them, as nobody felt responsible for their upkeep.
Moreover
Linking Words
, people who receive something for nothing rarely value it,
whereas
Linking Words
a small rent or loan repayment gives residents a sense of ownership and a reason to work. In my view,
therefore
Linking Words
, the state should help through cheap loans and partial subsidies rather than through completely free housing.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the poorest citizens must be protected from homelessness, yet giving homes away is too expensive and discourages effort. On balance, generous but partial support is the fairer and more sustainable policy.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your view is clear from the start: you agree that people need help, but you do not support free homes for all who cannot pay. To make the answer even stronger, explain more clearly why cheap rent, loans, and part payment would still protect people with very low pay.
task response
Your main ideas are well chosen: free homes can cost too much, and full gifts may reduce care for the home. Add one short point about how the plan could help people who cannot work, such as old people or people who are ill.
task response
Your examples fit your ideas well. Make sure that each example is clearly linked back to your main point in the same paragraph, so the reader can see exactly what it proves.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear path: opening view, one side, the other side, and a final answer. Keep this shape in future essays.
coherence and cohesion
Your paragraph links are good, especially “Admittedly”, “Nevertheless”, and “Moreover”. You could use a few simpler links at times, such as “Also”, “As a result”, or “For this reason”, to avoid making the flow feel too formal.
coherence and cohesion
Some sentences are long and hold several ideas. Split one or two of them into shorter sentences, especially in the last body paragraph, to make the key points easier to follow.
task response
You answer all parts of the question and keep the same view throughout the essay.
task response
You give clear reasons for your view and support them with useful examples from Morocco and Rabat.
coherence and cohesion
Each paragraph has one clear job, and the ideas move in a natural order.
coherence and cohesion
The ending clearly repeats your main view and gives a fair plan: help people, but do not give every home for free.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Social safety net
  • Economic stability
  • Unemployment benefits
  • Financial security
  • Economic downturn
  • Poverty
  • Stimulate the economy
  • Job seeking
  • Dependency culture
  • Fiscal responsibility
  • Government expenditure
  • Labor market
  • Fraud
  • Welfare abuse
  • Quality of life
  • Budget constraints
  • Economic strain
  • Public funds
  • Employment incentives
What to do next:
Look at other essays: