Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree?
In this capitalistic world, everything is monetized and art is no exception. Society, these days, is abuzz over a debate that the majority of artists are not adequately paid for their work. Hence, government should inte
Many people are of the opinion that artists who do not earn a decent income should be supported by the government. I do not agree with this point of view because I believe government funding should be spent on pressing s
Artists are not well recognized in some countries, as they should have been. It is debated that the artists having low salaries, should receive government fundings encourgaing them to continue their work and lead a norm
It is argued that art is considered as the least earning profession which makes it difficult for artists to proceed with their work hence the government ought to support artists financially. I would agree that the state
Some people think most artist earns very low salary and hence they should receive funding form, the government in order to continue their work. I strongly disagree with the statement as most of the artist get help from n
Art is a part of human life, in many countries, people preserve their arts for upcoming generations. Some people believe that the government should provide aid to the artists in order to make them sustain in their field.
Artists' play an imperative role in human civilization.Although the artists have less wage compared to other sectors, but they have support from non-profit organisations, and with the advent of technology they are recogn
The government is responsible for funding the arts because most artists do not make enough money to support themselves. In my opinion, I strongly agree that the government ought to support artists as it will greatly brin