It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is no doubt that reading and learning process has changed since the introduction of Television. The search for information has become easier and amusing, and presence of innumerable channels has expedited the data availability. Though the delivery mechanism

has became

Suggestion

has become

more interactive, but, they have not yet become

substitute

Suggestion

a substitute

for reading books or newspapers for giving wings to fantasy and linguistic capabilities. To commence with, there are

array

Suggestion

an array

of reasons why

conventional way

Suggestion

the conventional way

of reading is more popular.

First

of all, reading has become an ardent habit of many people.

Everyone whether

Accept comma addition

Everyone, whether

young or old of from affluent or middle class enjoys reading.

Furthermore

, books or newspapers are the cheapest, easiest and portable medium for information. Books or newspapers are so handy that mere flip of the pages can make you omniscient. Reading help brim individuals vocabulary through a variety of expressions used. Pictures while reading are icing on the cake as they tend to attract everyone and allows them to infer and interpret in their own meaningful ways.

However

, undoubtedly, technology has given radical approach for imagination and linguistic skills, for examples, video can provide full and clear view to reading

besides

that can be recorded and repeated as per the owner.

However

, reading infuses heterogeneity to express ideas, which can take the reader to

a

Suggestion

an

emotional time travel. In summary, the advancements in technology

is

Suggestion

are

irrefutable and there would be no place to

technophobic

in

this

ever-advanced modern world, yet, according to me, reading has more benefits than drawbacks.