The news media have become too much influence in people lives today and this is a negative development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the world is witnessing the transfer of powers from the old generations to the younger generations in leadership roles across sectors and disciplines. In fact, there is an emerging debate that systems with younger leaders and directors are often managed more effectively. From my perspective, I support this point of view for the following reasons. First and foremost, younger leaders that are born and raised in a highly connected world often possess an open mind and attitude toward contributive criticism. That enables them to notice the initiatives for positive changes from unexpected places and diversify the inputs for the sustainable development of companies and organizations. Moreover, in the long term, an open mind is the key to constant progress and development, especially for people in leadership roles. Secondly, leaders of younger ages are proficient in advanced technologies and diverse communications platforms. These characteristics significantly assist young and enthusiastic leaders in allocating and managing resources more efficiently, which creates increased benefits for companies and organizations. On the other hand, it is argued that senior leaders are more mature and experienced compared to their younger counterparts. That allows them not only to easily gain the trust of their partners, but also to make carefully calculated decisions. In conclusion, although leadership will ultimately be transferred to the young generations, it is highly crucial that experience and lessons learnt on management are also shared together with powers, so that young leaders can improve their work based on the understanding of former leaders’ mistakes and strategies.
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users