The following are measures which will be considered to assure the reliability of the research

-

Replicability

: It refers the act of repeating things for another time in order to avoid the error which was done at

first

.

This

will be achieved through preparing

research

materials

for

instance

, and revise them a couple times to ensure the accuracy of what is meant to be in the search tools.

Also

,

replicability

relevance by virtue of being applicable to the matter at hand

applicability

will be done during

data analysis phase

Suggestion

the data analysis phase

, where transcripts will be written carefully and

rechecked

refuse to accept or acknowledge

reject

another time, and when they are being used. - Standardization:

This

process involves having data that are conforming to a certain standard.

This

can be realized through creating standardized search tools,

for

instance

standard questionnaire (

Verhoeven

,

Accept space

,

2015) in order to acquire the exact information

that is

needed.

This

will be achieved through preparing

for

instance

interview questionnaires beforehand to assure that the topics that need to be investigated are all introduced and are asked in the most appropriate ways. - Pilots: It refers to techniques of enhancing the reliability of the

research

topics by making a test interview (

Verhoeven

,

Accept space

,

2015).

This

will be achieved through making some test interviews with one of my colleagues at Synano B.V. - Peer feedback:

This

refers to having the

research

tools, collected data and reports being checked by peer to leverage the accuracy of information (

Verhoeven

,

Accept space

,

2015)..

This

will be achieved through getting feedbacks from my thesis supervisor and my company coach. - Report and Justification:

This

refers to keeping records of what has been done, time and the progress,

for

instance

by using logbook (

Verhoeven

,

Accept space

,

2015).

This

will be achieved by using the general thesis timeline and personal agenda. The

second

variable

Suggestion

variant

variation

variety

of credibility is

Validity

. It refers to the level in which the

research

is free of systematic errors (

Verhoeven

,

Accept space

,

2015).

Systematic error

Suggestion

A systematic error

occurs as when the respondent is intentionally giving the wrong answer.

This

can be done due to the type of topics or personal (

Verhoeven

,

Accept space

,

2015). There

is

Suggestion

are

also

internal

validity

and external

validity

. Internal

validity

is when can make a right conclusion from them

(

Accept space

(

results) and external

validity

is basically related to the sample or size of sample. The measures that will be taken to consider the

validity

of the

research

include: - Selection of participant: a self-selection as our sampling method that shows how the results from our respondents are valid.