In recent decades, global warming has been receiving a great deal of media attention around the world due to its substantial impacts on human life.
the idea of coexistence between
and humans appears reasonable,
cannot be viewed as the ultimate approach for humankind to combat
There are a number of reasons why the coexistence can do more harm than good.
is largely shaped by human-caused
the practical application of science to commerce or industry
rather than nature itself.
, in order to produce the energy that drives the world’s economy, most nations rely on carbon- rich fuels like coal, oil and gas, which directly correlates with the intensification of global warming.
, even if citizens agree to keep the environment the way it is, corporations, especially in the manufacturing and mining industries, would not as that would affect their profits.
, it can be implied that if corporations were not held accountable for their contribution to global warming as in the case of coexistence, the issue of
would inevitably be exacerbated.
is more economically sound
to actively prevent
than to ignore it. In fact, the costs, either financial or non-financial, of dealing with future consequences of
can be overwhelming.
, the increase in intensity and frequency of storms can cause massive destructions and deaths in many coastal areas, which would take decades to recover.
, rising temperatures have
contributed to the extinction of species worldwide. It should be noted that the extinction is irreversible and comes at great cost to the ecosystem and apparently humans living within it.
In conclusion, actively combating global warming must be regarded as top priority given
urgency. Governments and corporations worldwide should take steps to ensure that
remains at bay.