Arts is increasingly becoming an indispensable part in our current lives. While some people advocate the idea of free expression of artists, some regulations are allegedly taken into account to control the artistic creators. From my own perspectives, I do believe that they should be given rights to disclose their own messages under state legislations.
On the one hand, regardless of democratic regime the artists are living in, potentially detrimental consequences might be derived from reckless art works.
, emotionally vulnerable teenagers are likely to be susceptible to brutal and pornographic contents on the Internet websites they surf.
the images might be judged to be valuable creative works, they are not controlled to keep distance from children, who probably imitate the sensitive things.
, when it comes to
, sarcastic pictures about revered religious leaders could result in bloody revenges of followers.
, an act of head-cut was carried out by Iraq terrorists as a violent reaction to
in the country.
As a result
photographs or other visual representations in a printed publication
should be sternly controlled by a
institution so as to reduce the potential risks.
, either art works or artists themselves should be placed into legislative rules. Artists are well-known influencing persons, whose
manner of acting or controlling yourself
, attitudes and manners always draw public attention. It is taken for granted that the moral actions of celebrities have
on their fans and vice versa. Take Justine Bieber
, his insulting words to others as well as his addiction to drug did not only ruin his singer
make a negative mimic to his avid fans generally and adolescence particularly.
In conclusion, how extraordinarily creative the artists are, their messages to
should be still thoroughly controlled by the parliament's regulations. Government plays a key role in successful debuts of talented creators as well as quality management of