Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate. Which do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion

It is being argued by many that schools have to be entertaining, while others believe the primary objective of schools is imparting education. keeping in view both narratives, I firmly believe with the former argument. The mind of a child can only absorb limited amount of knowledge by use of conventional ways of teaching. It is of paramount importance that schools incorporate extra-curricular activities like singing and computer gaming classes between science lessons to keep the minds of children fresh and receptive. To illustrate, there was a documentary broadcasted few years back that showed children who indulged in extra-curricular activities in school performed better in exams that students who focused solely on studies through out school-time. Thus, introducing fun activities is the new addition to achieve high rate of success among school going children. Another main reason is that entertainment facilities like musical concerts in school can be linked to the performance of each individual, so that children will be more enthusiastic as well as more inclined to perform better. They will be more receptive towards study, they will work hard to enjoy the various fun activities provided within the school premises. As a result of this, the high achievers can be rewarded and it will promote a healthy competition as well. To illustrate, private schools in Pakistan are preferred over public school because of these entertainment facilities, as education is nearly the same. All in all, by providing entertainment facilities schools can reward high achievers and increase their success percentages.
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users