Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

The debate on how to tackle environmental problems is raging in the recent times, due to the upcoming Paris summit of world leaders. Scientists, politicians and common citizens are voicing their opinions regarding
this
, which fit in a wide spectrum.
However
, there is one area which is taking
center
an area that is approximately central within some larger region
centre
stage given the political
color
a visual attribute of things that results from the light they emit or transmit or reflect
colour
of the Paris meetings. It is, whether to tackle the issue nationally or globally. On the one hand, proponents of the global solution theory believe that, given the nature of the problem, which transcends the national boundaries, handling it should be done at
global level
Suggestion
a global level
the global level
and working in silos would not solve it holistically. They quote the recurring smog problem of the Indian
capital Delhi
Accept comma addition
capital, Delhi
, saying that it could not be solved by the Indian state alone as the smoke emanates from the burning stubble on the Pakistani space as well.
On the other hand
, evangelists of dealing at national level theory argue that not all problems are truly global, like cleaning of the river Ganga, which needs little consultation with other countries. I is
also
opined that delays due to making agreements with others will
further
damage our ecosystems. It is believed that hardly any
such
deals
gets
Suggestion
get
materialized, and
hence
working locally to conserve ecology would yield better results. As a reference they quote on how river Brahmaputra is being cleaned by India despite pollution from the Chinese side. But in my opinion the answer lies somewhere in the middle. To conclude, I opine that the countries should work individually
initially
to identify their issues and possible solutions. The lack of interference makes it easy for nations to implement policies quicker.
However
,
in addition
to
this
, they must identify the points which need collaboration and take it to international forums to cleanse the pollution from our atmosphere and save
life
Suggestion
lives
a life
.
Submitted by sriharshakolluru2007 on

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next: