Governments should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that countries should allocate more funds to

education

than to leisure and competitive games. It is agreed that national budgets should prioritise schools and universities over sports and play.

This

essay will discuss

firstly

, the economic

benefits

Accept comma addition

benefits, education

education

can bring to a nation and

secondly

, the social benefits it has; followed by a reasoned conclusion. Investment in its

education

system is one of the best ways to improve a country’s economy in the long term. The more students entering

third

level

education

, the more skilled a workforce will be and

this

leads to higher innovation and productivity.

For example

, South Korea and Finland took the decision to invest a large proportion of their budget

in

Suggestion

on

education

and

this

has reaped benefits in the form of high-tech companies

such

as Samsung and Nokia.

However

, people cannot work hard all the time and these companies do provide leisure facilities for their workers.

Education

is not just about improving the

economy it

Accept comma addition

economy, it

also

has many social benefits. Well educated people tend to be more aware of social evils

such

as drugs, alcohol and sexual health.

For example

, Singapore educates all of its citizens on the dangers of drugs and

this

has resulted in one of the lowest levels of drug abuse in the world. Despite

this

, sports can

also

teach children valuable soft skills,

such

as teamwork and work ethic which

also

help curb social ills. In conclusion,

education

should take precedence over sports when it comes to funding due to the many

socio-economic

involving social as well as economic factors

socioeconomic

benefits it brings. It is recommended that governments continue to pump money into schools and universities in order to realise long-term goals.