The Restoration of old buildings in major cities around the world costs governments billions of dollars while this money should have been used for new housing and road development.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement?

t
Suggestion
T
is an undeniable truth that with increasing economic growth
of
Suggestion
by
country
,
Accept space
,
government
Suggestion
the government
extracts the revenue to spend on deteriorated buildings and spend a mere amount on new projects.
lnstead
Suggestion
Lnstead
of completely renovating these institutions the authorities should plan for some new infrastructure
,
Accept space
,
taking
view
Suggestion
the view
that building place has no symbolic importance and is
builded
(used of soaps or cleaning agents) having a substance (an abrasive or filler) added to increase effectiveness
built
for public need.I
am firmly agree
Suggestion
firmly agree
have firmly agreed
with
this
statement and elucidate my view in following paragraphs. The
first
and the foremost reason in favour of new construction is that it will cost less than to destroy and rebuild.One has to introduce more force in case to destroy a building.
This
will cause
more economical
Suggestion
more economic
burden.
Moreover
,
Accept space
,
extra
time
is needed for renovation purpose.So
,
Accept space
,
restoration process
Suggestion
the restoration process
is more
time
consuming than for new construction.
In addition
to
this
,
Accept space
,
there is wastage of material in the former process
instead
it is always better to use that capital,
time
and force
into
Suggestion
in
new construction.
On the other
hand if
Accept comma addition
hand, if
the building is a symbolic place or a Heritage
site
Accept comma addition
site, then
then
government
Suggestion
the government
must take
care
of the situation and decide
accordingly
because these sites have some historical importance.
Also
,
Accept space
,
the guiding authorities is must take
care
of public convenience like educational institutions and hospitals.These
institution
Suggestion
institutions
need proper
care
and
also
must be renovated
on
Suggestion
in
time
. In conclusion
,
Accept space
,
I conclude that
government
should encourage new infrastructure to get
developed but
Accept comma addition
developed, but
also
government
must take
care
of historical sites and public convenience.
Submitted by naresh on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: