Some people think the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?

It is commonly believed by many that inflating the cost of
fuel
is the most efficient way to solve environmental issues. I partially agree with them because I believe that
although
it is an important
way but
Accept comma addition
way, but
there are many other more effective ways of doing so. On one hand,
increase
Suggestion
an increase
in the
rate
of
fuel
would definitely reduce the level of pollution to some extent. As increased
rate
will discourage people to
use
their vehicles unnecessarily, as it is a common trend to drive a car even though the distance is
walkable
.
This
will encourage people to
use
pooling of vehicle while going to
same site
Suggestion
the same site
.
For instance
, if five people from one community work in
same office
Suggestion
the same office
or location, it is the
efficient
Suggestion
most efficient
to go
by
obtain by purchase; acquire by means of a financial transaction
buy
one car alternatively.
This
will
also
motivate them to
use
bicycles and public transport system.
Thus
,
this
will solve the problem to some extent.
On the other hand
, I believe
this
is not the key method and there are many other effective ways to solve environmental issues
such
as growing more trees and avoid
use
Suggestion
the use
of plastic bags. Plastic containers should be replaced by bio-degradable glass dishes.
Also I
Accept comma addition
Also, I
believe that
this
change would provide some level of discomfort to the public as the public transport system in most of the countries are not very convenient. In short, only increasing the
rate
of
fuel
would not protect the environment, people have to become conscious about the
surrounding
the environmental condition
surroundings
and put their contribution by many other ways
such
as aforementioned. In conclusion, I agree that inflated rates of
fuel
would decrease the environmental
problems but
Accept comma addition
problems, but
it is not the most efficient way, as it will benefit the environment but may provide inconvenience to public. Only increasing the
rate
of
fuel
would not improve the adverse condition of our environment, many other measures need to be taken
such
as planting trees, choosing glass over plastic and using renewable resources
instead
of fossil fuels.
Submitted by harmankaursethi on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental sustainability
  • renewable energy
  • fossil fuels
  • public transportation
  • carbon footprint
  • economic incentives
  • alternative energy vehicles
  • fuel-efficient
  • government subsidies
  • economic disparity
  • urban planning
  • rural infrastructure
  • sustainable development
  • carbon tax
  • green technology
  • demand elasticity
  • energy conservation
  • climate change mitigation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: