Some people think the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly believed by many that inflating the cost of
fuel
is the most efficient way to solve environmental issues. I partially agree with them because I believe that although
it is an important way but
there are many other more effective ways of doing so.
On one hand, Accept comma addition
way, but
increase
in the Suggestion
an increase
rate
of fuel
would definitely reduce the level of pollution to some extent. As increased rate
will discourage people to use
their vehicles unnecessarily, as it is a common trend to drive a car even though the distance is walkable
. This
will encourage people to use
pooling of vehicle while going to same site
. Suggestion
the same site
For instance
, if five people from one community work in same office
or location, it is the Suggestion
the same office
efficient
to go Suggestion
most efficient
by
one car alternatively. obtain by purchase; acquire by means of a financial transaction
buy
This
will also
motivate them to use
bicycles and public transport system. Thus
, this
will solve the problem to some extent.
On the other hand
, I believe this
is not the key method and there are many other effective ways to solve environmental issues such
as growing more trees and avoid use
of plastic bags. Plastic containers should be replaced by bio-degradable glass dishes. Suggestion
the use
Also I
believe that Accept comma addition
Also, I
this
change would provide some level of discomfort to the public as the public transport system in most of the countries are not very convenient. In short, only increasing the rate
of fuel
would not protect the environment, people have to become conscious about the surrounding
and put their contribution by many other ways the environmental condition
surroundings
such
as aforementioned.
In conclusion, I agree that inflated rates of fuel
would decrease the environmental problems but
it is not the most efficient way, as it will benefit the environment but may provide inconvenience to public. Only increasing the Accept comma addition
problems, but
rate
of fuel
would not improve the adverse condition of our environment, many other measures need to be taken such
as planting trees, choosing glass over plastic and using renewable resources instead
of fossil fuels.Submitted by harmankaursethi on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.