Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts, and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Art is a form of human creativity.

However

, some citizens believe that national spending on the arts is unnecessary and the budget for it should be allocated for other sectors.

This

essay will explain why I believe it is not true and deliver some supporting facts and opinions related to it.

First

, focusing on the arts is not wasting money.

Unique form

Suggestion

A Unique form

of arts in a country attract tourists, which means it can increase the national income. It

is

Suggestion

has also become

also becomes

also

become an identity for a nation,

for instance

, Chiang May with its temples and Bali with its traditional dancing.

Second

, spending the money elsewhere does not mean that the ministry should ignore art, as long as there is a balance allocation for

another

not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied

other

segments, namely, education, sports, infrastructure, or anything else. I am certain that if a country only focus on one sector and ignore the others, it cannot become a well-developed nation.

Although

developing creative sectors is not as urgent as maintaining the infrastructure, its existence is necessary to enhance the level of tourist awareness to visit that place. It means,

government’s spending

Suggestion

the government’s spending

on art is a form of investment for supporting some potential places that not only be able to increase national

revenue but

Accept comma addition

revenue, but

also

allow people around to make a living from its impact

in

Suggestion

on

that district. To sum up,

although

some people think that money

allocation

Suggestion

allocated

on

Suggestion

for

the creative development in a country is unimportant, in contrary, I personally believe that it is wrong in some cases. Making a proper spending between arts and other sectors is important.