Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and connections between people. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

With the advent of technological advances, interactions among humans have been made easier.
However
, would it
also
make connections and relationships among individuals easier, too? In
this
essay, I will argue that while digital
communication
may be convenient and popular, it cannot replace face-to-face
communication
.
To begin
with, communicating ways witness some obvious benefits thanks to
such
technology
in terms of delivering speed and convenience. Specifically, thanks to instant messaging, human can receive messages from
other side
Suggestion
the other side
of the Earth in a fraction of
second
Suggestion
a second
.
Additionally
, not only can individuals check messaging notifications wherever they are, but they
also
get unlimited words of texting.
For instance
, social media sites like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter gain strong prevalences in information spreading, attracting thousands of people due to its applications on keeping in touch with one another.
Moreover
,
technology
allows people to make video calls simulating direct talks, let alone texting with icons.
However
, better
communication
does not equal better connections when it comes to interacting during talks. Obviously, despite tangible advantages of
technology
on
communication
, digital conversations cannot be
substitute
Suggestion
a substitute
substituted
for face-to-face
communication
. In fact, the more humans have online conversations, the less they will connect with others. Undeniably, non-verbal
communication
facilitates eye contact and body language, involving more expressions in communicating. Unfortunately, providing that individuals immerse in virtual talks, they will lose basic human skills of interacting. To conclude,
this
essay discussed how technological advances have improved
communication
, not connections. From my perspective, while the ways in which we interact with others have changed greatly thanks to current
technology
,
such
advances cannot replace non-verbal contact.
Submitted by fexibleman on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: