In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this?

While some people believe that building over the

country

side

lands is the unique way to resolve the housing limitation problems, the majority of people do not see

this

as a good approach. In my opinion, governments have to find an effective solution away from the countryside destruction.

To begin

, building over the

country

side

lands will lead to a severe consequences.

Firstly

, it will cause the shrinkage of

country

side

lands.

This

will result in decreasing the quantity of national agricultural supplies. Eventually, the government will have no options other than importing them from abroad.

This

means that the growth national income will fall down significantly.

Secondly

, people who choose to live across the

country

side

will go upset with destroying the green and quiet lands they used to live in.

Consequently

, those citizens will leave their lands resulting in sharp decline in the rural workforce. In order to overcome those problems,

a

expresses position, direction or location, or point in time

at

various solutions can be found to limit

this

phenomenon to the least

besides

finding a different ways to handle the housing unavailability. In example, increasing the maximum number of floors in the new buildings constructed in the city, can be an efficient.

Similarly

, demolishing the old small buildings to build new bigger ones that can host more apartments.

Lastly

, establishing new cities away from the countryside can be considered as powerful long term resolution. To conclude, governments are ought to invent and implement a new method to keep away from touching the countryside lands which can lead to a critical outcome.