Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

There is no doubt that medicines and other products are usually tested on animals before they are permitted to use by human. While I believe that animal testing is morally wrong,

this

essay would have to support the necessity of animal

experimentation

for the development purposes. On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal

experimentation

. To illustrate

this

, laboratory mice

is given

Suggestion

are given

an illness to investigate a new drug’s effects which can be measured. Opponents of

this

view discuss that, humans do not have any right to abuse animals to

this

kind of researches, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.

On the other hand

, the reliable alternatives should be considered

instead

of animal

experimentation

. Advocates of using animals in medical development argue that a certain

number

Suggestion

amount

of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They illustrate that opponents of

such

research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed using animal

experimentation

. Generally, I believe that banning of animal testing for non-medical products

is

Suggestion

are

necessary, but I think that it may be vital where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned. In conclusion, it seems that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.