Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that

wildlife

creatures plays nothing in our modern life so that the effortless of

conservating

fruit preserved by cooking with sugar

conserving

them make a huge

wasting

Suggestion

waste

of human resources. While I accept that suit many people, I believe that those kind of animals is always playing a vital part for our

plannet

(astronomy) any of the nine large celestial bodies in the solar system that revolve around the sun and shine by reflected light; Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto in order of their proximity to the sun; viewed from the constellation Hercules, all the planets rotate around the sun in a counterclockwise direction

planet

. On the one hand, it

can not

can not

cannot

be denied the important role of

wildlife

animals in our life.

Wildlife

organisms have been contributing to the sustainable development of the natural ecology. It is not only

an

Suggestion

a

vital part of the food chain, contributing to remain the balance of natural processes; but

also

providing the valuable genes for science research.

Furthermore

, those beautiful creatures

is

Suggestion

are

the main factors of biodiversity.

Consevating

Suggestion

Consulting

wildlife

animals in an

affective

producing or capable of producing an intended result or having a striking effect

effective

way can give our

herritage

practices that are handed down from the past by tradition

heritage

a good chance to see how greatest our

plannet

(astronomy) any of the nine large celestial bodies in the solar system that revolve around the sun and shine by reflected light; Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto in order of their proximity to the sun; viewed from the constellation Hercules, all the planets rotate around the sun in a counterclockwise direction

planet

are, as always.

On the other hand

, it is no doubt that

conservating

wildlife

animals costs a lot of resources.

Firstly

, a great deal of money is required to carry out any project to protect

wildlife

animals, in which the infrastructure and research are the two most expensive. The more difficult to attach animal tracking devices is, the more it costs.

Secondly

, the protecting

proccesses

a particular course of action intended to achieve a result

processes

process

have been started from a few organizations, so the budget for

this

activities

Suggestion

activity

is always expensive. That will be easier if every person gave a hand in

this

proccess

a particular course of action intended to achieve a result

process

processes

, trying to raise human awareness

surrouding

closely encircling

surrounding

us about

conservating

fruit preserved by cooking with sugar

conserving

not only

wildlife

animals, but

also

biological resources in overall,

this

fighting would be more

affective

producing or capable of producing an intended result or having a striking effect

effective

and cost less resources than ever. In conclusion, it is certainly true that animal fighting protection costs a great amount of resources, but

this

is by no mean that those effortless is meaningless because

wildlife

animals always play an important role in human life, now and forever.