The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The deterioration of environment attracts much government’s concern. It leads to the controversy about raising

fuel

cost. While some people argue that

this

practice can reduce consuming

fuel

and lessen air pollution, I think it is not the best way to tackle the problems as there are better ways and the

price

increases could lead to economic issues.

To begin

with, several measures could be applied to decelerate the rate of pollution.

Firstly

, rather than non-renewable resources, government should invest in alternatives

such

as wind and solar energy. These kinds of power have been

proved

Suggestion

proven

as effective ways to mitigate carbon dioxide emission in Europe and America.

Secondly

, enhancing public transportation and reducing travelling cost could encourage people to use public vehicles more;

consequently

, vehicles’

fume

the state or quality of being widely honored and acclaimed

fame

could be reduced. Apart from the government, automobile corporations could contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emission by manufacturing electric products.

For instance

, electric cars of Tesla use electricity as the main power leads to the decrease in exhaust.

On the other hand

, increasing the

price

of

fuel

cause a burden on the economy.

Fuel

cost determines the market

price

as rising

fuel

costs could lead to another increase in the

price

of daily used groceries, food, and other households.

As a result

, middle and low-class families are unable to afford household expenditure.

Therefore

, the gap between the poor and the rich is

widened which

Accept comma addition

widened, which

could result in economy economic instability and inflation. In conclusion, I strongly believe that raising the

price

of

fuel

is not the best measure to address environmental problems.