Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
The laws of Britain and Australia state that the jury involved in a criminal case is given no access to background information about the defendant’s past criminal record.
This
Linking Words
as a matter of fact protects the person accused of the criminal charge against him. Few lawyers are of the opinion that
this
Linking Words
practice should be revised and the judging committee must be given access before they give their final verdict. I strongly agree with the group of lawyers that suggest understanding the past criminal records before having their final judgment on the accused. Certain crimes like theft, murders etc.
arise
Suggestion
Arise
from an understanding of the individual’s personality. A linkage
from
Suggestion
of
the past will bring light as to the understanding the accused at hand.
For example
Linking Words
: In the movie “The Green Mile” the accused was a man charged
on
Suggestion
with
false claims of him murdering two young girls. The truth
was
Suggestion
has been
just, that he was found beside the dead body of those children.
Although
Linking Words
with no excuse to hear, the officers handed him over to be hung to death. In
this
Linking Words
case only after his death did an official discover the truth.
On the other hand
Linking Words
a past sketch of the person with troubles through childhood or youth may stumble the decision of the jury.
This
Linking Words
can
further
Linking Words
aggravate the situation and turn the case against the accused. To conclude with, it is necessary to draw past activities to ascertain that the defendant is not wrongly held
for
Suggestion
in
the matter that he has been held account of.
Submitted by rufina on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: