Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Gossiping fresh news
of
the most popular Suggestion
about
celebrites
a widely known person
celebrities
have long been
an exciting Suggestion
has long been
had long been
recreation
activity in people's social life, and the majority of these news Suggestion
recreational
are produced
by Suggestion
is produced
paparazzi
following Suggestion
the paparazzi
celebrites
. a widely known person
celebrities
However
, opinions are divided about whether this
form of stalking behaviour should be allowed. Both sides will be discussed before a conclusion is share
in Suggestion
shared
this
essay.
On one hand, some people condemn paparazzi
because they believe taking pictures without consent is unethic
. They believe not conforming to approved standards of social or professional behavior
unethical
humanbeing
need to separate themselves from their profession lives, as would celebrities. A study Suggestion
human being
by
Suggestion
of
new England medical journal
shows that Suggestion
the new England medical journal
overmonitoring
in Suggestion
over monitoring
workplace
could cause long term health damages, Suggestion
the workplace
such
as anxious and depression
. As stalking would Suggestion
depressed
de
facto prolong celebrities's equivalent working hours, and make them feel insecure and monitered
every keep tabs on; keep an eye on; keep under surveillance
monitored
seconds
, they don't accept Suggestion
second
this
approach of creating news.
On the other hand
, certain gourps
support any number of entities (members) considered as a unit
groups
paparazzi
. In their minds, if a person were to chose
to live a public life, they must prepare sacrificing their private life. Suggestion
choose
For example
, relationship status of a celebrity should be always be shared no matter how. These people tend to argue that this
is for the good of the celebrities themselves, because these photos or videos would increase their exposure on media, and as a result
boost their fame. Thus
, they think stalkers should be protected from lawsuits and resentments.
In conclusion, paparazzi
are at the center
of the sensitive topic of how much the celebrities should give up for their professional developments, and they are both supported and refuted by many. In my an area that is approximately central within some larger region
centre
opionion
, I strongly agree that a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty
opinion
paparazzi
should be punished, Suggestion
the paparazzi
as a result
of their unethical and unlawful actions that has been harming many people.Submitted by liqiao.phy on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?