Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Gossiping fresh news
of
Suggestion
about
the most popular
celebrites
a widely known person
celebrities
have long been
Suggestion
has long been
had long been
an exciting
recreation
Suggestion
recreational
activity in people's social life, and the majority of these news
are produced
Suggestion
is produced
by
paparazzi
Suggestion
the paparazzi
following
celebrites
a widely known person
celebrities
.
However
, opinions are divided about whether
this
form of stalking behaviour should be allowed. Both sides will be discussed before a conclusion is
share
Suggestion
shared
in
this
essay. On one hand, some people condemn
paparazzi
because they believe taking pictures without consent is
unethic
not conforming to approved standards of social or professional behavior
unethical
. They believe
humanbeing
Suggestion
human being
need to separate themselves from their profession lives, as would celebrities. A study
by
Suggestion
of
new England medical journal
Suggestion
the new England medical journal
shows that
overmonitoring
Suggestion
over monitoring
in
workplace
Suggestion
the workplace
could cause long term health damages,
such
as anxious and
depression
Suggestion
depressed
. As stalking would
de
facto prolong celebrities's equivalent working hours, and make them feel insecure and
monitered
keep tabs on; keep an eye on; keep under surveillance
monitored
every
seconds
Suggestion
second
, they don't accept
this
approach of creating news.
On the other hand
, certain
gourps
any number of entities (members) considered as a unit
groups
support
paparazzi
. In their minds, if a person were to
chose
Suggestion
choose
to live a public life, they must prepare sacrificing their private life.
For example
, relationship status of a celebrity should be always be shared no matter how. These people tend to argue that
this
is for the good of the celebrities themselves, because these photos or videos would increase their exposure on media, and
as a result
boost their fame.
Thus
, they think stalkers should be protected from lawsuits and resentments. In conclusion,
paparazzi
are at the
center
an area that is approximately central within some larger region
centre
of the sensitive topic of how much the celebrities should give up for their professional developments, and they are both supported and refuted by many. In my
opionion
a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty
opinion
, I strongly agree that
paparazzi
Suggestion
the paparazzi
should be punished,
as a result
of their unethical and unlawful actions that has been harming many people.
Submitted by liqiao.phy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • invasion of privacy
  • personal space
  • media scrutiny
  • mental health
  • public figures
  • relentless pursuit
  • legal implications
  • ethical considerations
  • tabloid journalism
  • financial gain
  • public interest
What to do next:
Look at other essays: