A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The subject of Animal rights has resulted in a string of disparate ideas, with one group decrying their exploitation, and advocating

instead

Linking Words

, for a recognition of equal rights. The other set of people,

on the other hand

Linking Words

,

hold

Suggestion

holds

brief for the idea that man’s different needs,

such

Linking Words

as the search for what to eat, and quest for knowledge, ought to come

first

Linking Words

. My view, as shall be reflected in

this

Linking Words

essay, is unequivocally in consensus with the

later

referring to the second of two things or persons mentioned (or the last one or ones of several)

latter

view, and while the former, will be recognized for their selflessness, superiority will be put forward to demonstrate divergence towards their stance. One major reason why animals may be considered by some, as equal, when it comes to

privileges

Suggestion

the privileges

and rights recognition, is the notion that probably informs their belief, which is that they are trying to be selfless.

In other words

Linking Words

, they are inclined to

believing

Suggestion

believe

that taking advantage of these creatures, is unfair and they regard whoever that indulges in

such

Linking Words

, as unfeeling and selfish. It would

then

Linking Words

appear that, if justice and equity is to be achieved, the only way out, would be to enforce their rights. I find

Linking Words

this

Accept comma addition

this, however

however

Linking Words

, absurd, as animals neither have souls in my opinion, nor even recognize selfish

behavior

manner of acting or controlling yourself

behaviour

, and as

such

Linking Words

, cannot be adversely affected by ill treatment, as the

purporters

(law) someone who owns (is legal possessor of) a business

proprietors

of

this

Linking Words

claim may have us believe. Despite the

seemingly

Suggestion

seeming

, well-meaning intention

by

Suggestion

of

the opposing group above, their arguments are not considered fundamental enough, as human beings

are arguably

Accept comma addition

are, arguably

, far more superior than animals, and

therefore

Linking Words

, should come

first

Linking Words

in terms of their choices and desires, especially as concerns not just their feeding, but

also

Linking Words

, in the pursuit for understanding. It is in no small measure, that they maintain the environment for the benefit of even the animals in question, through means

such

Linking Words

as re-forestation and fending off natural disasters

,

Accept space

,

which could

otherwise

Linking Words

, claim the universe.

Hence

Linking Words

, if we were to be fair

on

Suggestion

in

this

Linking Words

matter, it is only logical to accord men, and justifiably so, the priority and the privilege to fend for themselves anyhow they deem fit. Having methodically

analyzed

examined carefully and methodically; broken down for consideration of constituent parts

analysed

this

Linking Words

topical issue, what

then

Linking Words

is the conclusion to be drawn? It can be seen from above, that there is a view

by

Suggestion

of

certain individuals that animals are equal to humans,

although

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

essay went ahead to prove them wrong by placing humans above them in terms of importance.