Some countries with long average working hours are more economically successful than their countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree?

The duration of work measures the economical prosperity of a
nation
. Those countries, where employees indulge in extended working hours are considered to be rich in comparison to the nations that do not follow
such
exhausting work schedules. I do not concur with the notion at all, as other factors are the primary force to a wealthy
nation
. To embark on, more than the usual duration of work plummets productivity. Owing to
this
, a
nation
cannot prosper financially. The human mind is not adapted to indulge in any job beyond a certain point. If it is forced to push its limits,
then
it produces detrimental outcomes rather than producing fruitful results.
Thus
, it is squandering of capital and time. Lethargy,
for instance
, takes the place of energy. A person feels exhausted while carrying out tasks at the workplace and could give its full to the projects.
Therefore
, the entire concept of extended working hours is futile in terms of financial development of a
nation
. To elucidate
further
, technological advancement is one of the effective parameters to judge the economic viability of a country.
Although
some nations might be having more than the standard tenure of job and are wealthy as well, technology is a predominant cause of its prosperity. The United States of America,
for instance
, is one the richest continents in the world, and it credits its growth in the thriving technology. It has produced exemplary discoveries owing to the advent of technology. The workforce follows brain-drain due to
this
reason only. And a
nation
becomes inundated with productive professionals and enhances its rich status. To recapitulate, I discard the belief than long working hours put a
nation
at
Suggestion
in
the top slot of being wealthy in comparison to the countries that incorporates minimum working hours because
this
practice alleviates productivity.
Instead
, a technological push renders economical prosperity and should be propagated.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: