Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It
is has been argued
Suggestion
is argued
argues
that that the people can not
effect
have an effect upon
affect
positively
Suggestion
positive
on their
habitat
, but
also
either administrator or big enterprises alone can perform it. I disagree that administrators and firm alone can
effect
improvement to the
territory
because the people are closer to their home as well as have the
time
to execute a project that can boost the surroundings. To start with, the administrators and big organisation can not achieve the betterment of the
territory
due to the fact that they are far from the surroundings.
This
is because the people have the direct contact to the
habitat
, which can better their home. Take
for instance
, my community leaders tend to construct a new
street roads
Suggestion
street, road
street road
, they contacted public officials and large organisations, but they turn a deft hear to the
complains
Suggestion
complaint
complainant
, which lead the people to upgrade the road by themselves.
Hence
, the surroundings can only be upgraded by the people. Another point to consider is that both the public officers and the large enterprise
does not have
Suggestion
do not have
the
time
to
effect
have an effect upon
affect
positively on the
territory
. In fact, they are busy to concentrate on it, but the people alone have the
time
to boost it. Take
for example
, the
time
spent on gathering documents funds
can not
can not
cannot
be over emphasised but citizen have
lot
Suggestion
a lot
lots
of
time
to upgrade
territory
when they are ready to
effect
it.
As a result
of
this
, projects are
been
the state or fact of existing
being
delayed. In conclusion, people
can not
can not
cannot
achieve the improvement of their home,
however
public officers and reputable organizations alone can boost the
habitat
. I disagree with
this
statement because only the citizens are close and have the
time
to resolve and better their
habitat
.
Submitted by Temitope on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental awareness
  • sustainable practices
  • renewable energy
  • carbon footprint
  • waste reduction
  • conservation
  • ecosystem
  • pollution
  • climate change
  • responsibility
  • leadership
  • legislation
  • investment
  • collaboration
  • systemic change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: