Some people think certain prisoner should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Having believed that not all offences are worth punishing and imprisonment, many suggest some alternate penalty for lawbreaking in terms of social work or free service for the community. I partially agree that criminals committing minor crimes should be left to contribute in social unpaid activities while, stern criminals should be punished in a stricter manner.
This
essay describes about how an alternative punishment can be helpful to the society, whereas it might not be suitable for all criminals.
Firstly
, Many offences are not severe and it is uncivilized to them behind the bars. In my opinion, criminals found with minor unlawful activity with ignorance or committing the crime unintentionally, who realize and repent for their act should be alternatively punished. Most of
such
crimes are believed to be non-repetitive and accidental which can be punished in a different way by contributing the development and betterment of society.
For instance
,
such
lawbreakers can do handloom work, waste management, plantation with the collaboration of NGOs to make the nation better.
On the contrary
, the criminals who indulge in heinous unforgivable crimes
such
as murder, rape, serial killing, terrorism and hijacking must not be overlooked by jurisdiction. Most of these crimes are with wrong intention and by the professionals who merely repent or realize the consequence of their terrific act. Terrorism is an unforgivable crime and should be harshly punished. In conclusion, someone with no criminal record or with minimal misconduct must be treated differently than serious killers. The sole objective of the law is to maintain peace in the society, not to punish people.
Thus
, unpaid community services are great chances for criminals to bring them back to their normal life.
Submitted by Bhagyashree on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reintegration
  • Recidivism
  • Reform
  • Restorative justice
  • Incarceration
  • Community service
  • Public safety
  • Skill development
  • Moral obligation
  • Punitive measures
  • Economic efficiency
  • Social consequences
  • Corrective action
  • Non-violent offenders
  • Justice system
  • Public opinion
  • Victim restitution
What to do next:
Look at other essays: