In many cities, there are areas of land that are used as parks. With increasing population levels, these areas would be better used to provide more housing. Do you agree or disagree?

Spaces allocated for parks seems to be smaller as population number is rising. Urban areas are directly affected as more and more people choose to spend their leisure

time

in parks.

This

essay will argue why parks should be not destroyed for building houses

instead

. Public gardens are a necessity in the cities.

Although

many people live in an apartment and work in offices, many choose fresh air when thinking to relax.

For instance

, in a city like Dubai, despite tall towers and buildings there are almost 100 parks with amenities that satisfy all ages

,

Accept space

,

starting from

infant

Suggestion

an infant

to an old person. Parks had been a place where families and not only, who live in the cities, choose to spend their free

time

. Government should look into the recreation garden situation and

instead

of choosing to increase the number of houses, I personally think that they should build taller buildings

instead

. In

this

way people can still live in the city,

moreover

, anyone can choose to stay near their home in a park rather

then

conjunction used in comparatives

than

escaping into the villages.

For example

, a recent research had shown that

in big cities people

Suggestion

people in big cities

are choosing not to travel but to spend their free

time

in a park under open sky, just to avoid the crowd and

time

wasted on driving.

This

essay argued that recreation gardens like parks should not be replaced by dwells as more and more people choose a different way of entertainment which can be

find

Suggestion

found

in it. No matter how many will choose to live in urban areas

,

Accept space

,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

consider that trees, lakes and even a kids playground will be always welcomed in crowded areas like cities.