Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that countries with lengthened working hours are more economically progressive than countries with a shorter period

.

Accept space

.

I completely agree with

this

opinion and think that nations with limited work hours are less accomplished and more predisposed to various ill vices

First

of all, I believe that a long work

time

enhances profit and

thus

growth of industries. Working for a longer period of

time

means that more task will be completed and

companys'

an institution created to conduct business

companies

company

accompanies

goals and objectives would be met within a shorter

time

frame which is tantamount to financial growth and

therefore

economic developments.

For Instance

, a recent research revealed over 20% surge in the GDP of a country where the federal government had extended the working period of its workers.

Secondly

,

this

means that less attention is paid to social vices

such

as stealing, cultism, drug abuse, sexual abuse.Having a lot of work to do will definitely leave no

time

for unhealthy behaviours that are against the morality of the

society

Accept comma addition

society, therefore

therefore

, a drastic decrease in the social menace inherent in a country. As reported recently, a certain community was able to cut down the menace of stealing when it engaged the youth in a community development program and extended its activities

further

. In conclusion, Nations with longer working hours are wealthier and promising than countries with shorter hours because of the extra income earned as well as a reduction in social vices

.

Accept space

.

It is

therefore

recommended that countries embrace

this

method of working for a richer and safer environment.